2,906,889 tasks
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : 2,906,889 tasks

Author Message
Profile Ben
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 14
Posts: 316
Credit: 1
RAC: 0
Message 2002 - Posted: 23 Feb 2015, 16:42:17 UTC
Last modified: 23 Feb 2015, 17:14:14 UTC

After the huge crash of the database, everything is fixed and ready to go.

2,906,889 more WUs!

Edit: The transitioner need to catch up

Maxxina
Send message
Joined: 11 Dec 13
Posts: 22
Credit: 251,337
RAC: 0
Message 2003 - Posted: 23 Feb 2015, 18:18:24 UTC

Thanks for new work. Just Q . Was watching little stuff about the work and wanna ask if it is normal. Sometimes me workunit, im crunching them and it goes slowly to like 20 percent after few min . And then right away they go to 100 percent and its send to server. Thats normal ?

Profile Charles Dennett
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Dec 14
Posts: 88
Credit: 3,342,826
RAC: 0
Message 2004 - Posted: 23 Feb 2015, 18:28:31 UTC - in response to Message 2003.

Yes, that's normal.
____________

Profile [SG] iz-germany-timo
Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 15
Posts: 2
Credit: 480,739
RAC: 0
Message 2009 - Posted: 24 Feb 2015, 13:13:39 UTC

Some WU´s 99,99% and crunchtime over 1 hour. That´s normaly, too?

Profile Charles Dennett
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Dec 14
Posts: 88
Credit: 3,342,826
RAC: 0
Message 2010 - Posted: 24 Feb 2015, 13:15:30 UTC - in response to Message 2009.
Last modified: 24 Feb 2015, 13:17:34 UTC

This bunch of tasks has some really super long running ones. I posted something about it in the Number Crunching forum a short while ago. Look in the "Credit Strangeness" thread.

Charlie
____________

Profile [SG] iz-germany-timo
Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 15
Posts: 2
Credit: 480,739
RAC: 0
Message 2011 - Posted: 24 Feb 2015, 13:27:42 UTC - in response to Message 2010.

thank you :-)

freestylah
Send message
Joined: 12 Dec 13
Posts: 6
Credit: 418,228
RAC: 0
Message 2033 - Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 18:29:24 UTC

I have approx. 50 like these.


<core_client_version>7.4.36</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Onjuiste functie.
(0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>

Receptor name: PFL2020c_1

Ligand name: CHEMBL1277134_3


Parse error on line 33 in file "ligand": Atom 22 has not been found in this branch
03:13:27 (5448): called boinc_finish(1)

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Aurel
Send message
Joined: 10 Feb 13
Posts: 84
Credit: 275,734
RAC: 0
Message 2074 - Posted: 3 Mar 2015, 16:15:09 UTC - in response to Message 2033.

Some experiments, 18pstiff2re for instance, contained many bad ligand structure. That's why you all had many failed WU.


Maybe the reason? Please give us the link to the failed unit.

Message boards : News : 2,906,889 tasks


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2017 Dr Anthony Chubb