Posts by Saenger
log in
1) Message boards : News : GridRepublic (Message 2854)
Posted 21 Dec 2016 by Profile Saenger
Well my BOINC continues to download and executes tasks but shows that message and doesnt say what Team i belong to.
And for me is impossible to change project URL cause its being managed by BAM

I changed my URL, and my team ist as well not shown in BOINC. It doesn't seem tio be connected to GR, it's just another fault of the interaction of the project with the client.[/quote]
2) Message boards : News : GridRepublic (Message 2851)
Posted 19 Dec 2016 by Profile Saenger
I want my usual account page, no account manager at all. Where is it?

It is literally in this website. Here.

That's the one, BOINC told me, as the wrong site to attach to:
Fight Neglected Diseases: Notice from BOINC
This project is using an old URL. When convenient, remove the project, then add https://compute.gridrepublic.org/ 07.12.2016 19:52:13

This message clearly told all participants: The URL is outdated, move over to the GridRepublic. Perhaps the head honchos should make a new message, that clearly states, that the project hasn't moved anywhere, that all was just a mistake.
3) Message boards : News : GridRepublic (Message 2849)
Posted 17 Dec 2016 by Profile Saenger
Where is the project in this list?
I expect all this stuff to be arranged proper before such a move is made. Was there any thinking beforehand at all?
4) Message boards : News : GridRepublic (Message 2846)
Posted 15 Dec 2016 by Profile Saenger
Is there any way to manage the project at its new location? I asked some time ago here, how to do this, but there doesn't seem to be anyone to answer. The fora over there are a bit disorganized anyway.

You do not need to use the GR account manager; you can stick to BAM. Your settings can be updated in this website.

I want my usual account page, no account manager at all. Where is it?
5) Message boards : News : GridRepublic (Message 2844)
Posted 14 Dec 2016 by Profile Saenger
Is there any way to manage the project at its new location? I asked some time ago here, how to do this, but there doesn't seem to be anyone to answer. The fora over there are a bit disorganized anyway.
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Latest workunits have bad runtime esrimates (Message 2173)
Posted 28 Mar 2015 by Profile Saenger
The last ones here have a huge jump in runtime and crunchtime, that in no way corresponds to the jump in credits.
Is there something going wrong? And in what regard?
I'd expect the C/h-ratio to be about the same for the same WUs, 'though I must say, the current ratio of 13 seems to bore fitting then the former 100 for this slow netbook ;)
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Incimplete Upload ?? (Message 1626)
Posted 26 Dec 2014 by Profile Saenger
The SQL server that store the results is down. But I can't switch it on because I'm in France... (Christmas)

Wait and see :)



OK, you're lost in France ;)

Happy Chrismas, joyeux Noël und fröhliche Weihnachten!
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Incimplete Upload ?? (Message 1624)
Posted 26 Dec 2014 by Profile Saenger
26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | sched RPC pending: Requested by user 26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | Reporting 26 completed tasks 26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | Requesting new tasks for ATI 26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices 26.12.2014 14:31:01 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] ATI work request: 172800.00 seconds; 1.00 devices 26.12.2014 14:31:07 | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 26.12.2014 14:31:08 | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | Project requested delay of 3600 seconds 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] Deferring communication for 01:00:00 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] Reason: project is down 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] Deferring communication for 03:01:41 26.12.2014 14:31:11 | FiND@Home | [sched_op] Reason: project is down


Project is still "Shut down for maintenance".
My computer says my last contact was 23 Dec 2014, 6:46:34 UTC.
26 results are waiting to be uploaded, and will expire on Silvester.

Should I ditch them and detach/reattach (it's just 26, not much lost) or wait a bit?
9) Message boards : Number crunching : A problem with a batch of vina 3.01 workunits? (Message 821)
Posted 22 Jul 2013 by Profile Saenger
I got a bunch of them as well.
They only ran for a few seconds until they failed, so not much wasted here.

Here's the stderr of one of them:
<core_client_version>7.0.65</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Parse error on line 28 in file "ligand.pdb": ATOM syntax incorrect: "Si" is not a valid AutoDock type. Note that AutoDock atom types are case-sensitive. 04:26:19 (21344): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>


And here an older one:
<core_client_version>7.0.65</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Parse error on line 53 in file "ligand.pdb": Atom 36 has not been found in this branch 12:12:57 (10142): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Server Out of Disk Space (Message 797)
Posted 5 Jul 2013 by Profile Saenger
Same here:
Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:47 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [fxd] starting upload, upload_offset -1 Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:47 CEST | fightmalaria@home | Started upload of vina_30611_1372996975.210970-409-PF13_0065_3.pdbqt-3264-TCMDC_138078_2.pdbqt-5p2-_0_0 Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:47 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [file_xfer] URL: http://boinc.ucd.ie/fmah_cgi/file_upload_handler Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [file_xfer] http op done; retval 0 (Success) Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [error] Error reported by file upload server: Server is out of disk space Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [file_xfer] parsing upload response: <data_server_reply> <status>1</status> <message>Server is out of disk space</message></data_server_reply> Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [file_xfer] parsing status: -127 Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [file_xfer] file transfer status -127 (transient upload error) Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | Temporarily failed upload of vina_30611_1372996975.210970-409-PF13_0065_3.pdbqt-3264-TCMDC_138078_2.pdbqt-5p2-_0_0: transient upload error Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | [file_xfer] project-wide xfer delay for 1625.220433 sec Fr 05 Jul 2013 16:36:49 CEST | fightmalaria@home | Backing off 2 min 57 sec on upload of vina_30611_1372996975.210970-409-PF13_0065_3.pdbqt-3264-TCMDC_138078_2.pdbqt-5p2-_0_0
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Parse error on line 15 in file "ligand.pdb": ATOM syntax incorrect: "Ge" is not a valid AutoDock type (Message 758)
Posted 26 Jun 2013 by Profile Saenger
Got 3 as well:
<core_client_version>7.0.65</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Parse error on line 25 in file "ligand.pdb": ATOM syntax incorrect: "Si" is not a valid AutoDock type. Note that AutoDock atom types are case-sensitive. 20:15:48 (21329): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
12) Message boards : Number crunching : 5. CHARITY TEAM CONTEST (Message 526)
Posted 2 Feb 2013 by Profile Saenger
We just reached the Top of the Teams here, amazing achievement co-crunchers!



After the weekend I'll go back to my original team, SG that is, but 'til then I'll crunch on to get us a bit up front from PNT.

Happy Vollgascrunching!
13) Message boards : News : Short downtime (Message 515)
Posted 30 Jan 2013 by Profile Saenger
There was a quite severe downtime today, that has just finished. The whole server, including this forum, was unavailable.
What happened? Hard- or software problems?
14) Questions and Answers : Web site : Combine both forum parts (Message 143)
Posted 16 Aug 2012 by Profile Saenger
Thanks for the quick implementation, once you found this part ;)
15) Questions and Answers : Web site : Combine both forum parts (Message 127)
Posted 11 Aug 2012 by Profile Saenger
Very few reads, methinks 3 alone by myself, makes the futility of this hidden forum part imhbo clear.
Please read this similar thread @POGS, were yoyo posted the solution for this layout problem.
16) Message boards : Number crunching : Ghost workunit (Message 125)
Posted 11 Aug 2012 by Profile Saenger
Nice weekend from here as well, but I want to make you aware of a whole bunch of ghost WUs on my netbook, that should have reached it just an hour ago, but never have. Here's the messages from my BOINC for that server contact:
11.08.2012 15:09:57 | fightmalaria@home | [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 11.08.2012 15:09:57 | fightmalaria@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 11.08.2012 15:09:57 | fightmalaria@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU 11.08.2012 15:09:57 | fightmalaria@home | [sched_op] CPU work request: 164543.98 seconds; 0.24 devices 11.08.2012 15:09:57 | fightmalaria@home | [sched_op] ATI work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices 11.08.2012 15:15:03 | fightmalaria@home | Scheduler request failed: Timeout was reached 11.08.2012 15:15:03 | fightmalaria@home | [sched_op] Deferring communication for 1 min 41 sec 11.08.2012 15:15:03 | fightmalaria@home | [sched_op] Reason: Scheduler request failed
17) Questions and Answers : Web site : Combine both forum parts (Message 115)
Posted 5 Aug 2012 by Profile Saenger
I really don't have the faintest idea, why this sub-optimal set-up is chosen by Berkeley, but to have both parts of the forum divided over two pages.
A better set-up is that chosen by some other projects, like Asteroids or Einstein, with all on one page.
18) Message boards : Number crunching : No Wingmen (Message 114)
Posted 5 Aug 2012 by Profile Saenger
Yes, you are correct. Validation doesn't go via direct comparison of double results.
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Incorrect CPU Time (Message 112)
Posted 5 Aug 2012 by Profile Saenger
Same problem over here at POGS, with another Kevin running the shop (is that the problem ;)).
The difference is: Here my computer (penguin) doesn't show this phenomenon, while there it does as well.
20) Message boards : Number crunching : Incorrect CPU Time (Message 76)
Posted 28 Jul 2012 by Profile Saenger
Run time 52,193.00
CPU time 152,710.50

Are there mt-apps, or how could that be possible?
CPU-time should always be less then run-time, if it's not mt.


Next 20

Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2017 Dr Anthony Chubb